User Box
Facebook Connect
Search
  • Thu
    24
  • Fri
    25
  • Sat
    26
  • Sun
    27
  • Mon
    28
  • Tue
    29
  • Wed
    30
San Diego Unseen: An Urban Portrait May 24, 2012 TRIART and 3RDSPACE present a photo art show featuring San Diego urban landscapes.  56 other things to do on Thursday, May 24
 
Last Blog on Earth | News
Lorie Zapf hopes a show of community support will save the stems
News
Our case against San Diego's most objectionable politician
News
Juvenile-justice experts question whether San Diego County Probation relies too heavily on OC spray to manage youth behavior
Editorial
The devils you know: We weigh in on local, state and federal races
Last Blog on Earth | News
DeMaio promised Charles LiMandri what? Read LiMandri's email to James Hartline.

 

 
Home / Blogs / Last Blog on Earth
. . . . .
Thursday, Nov 10, 2011 Last Blog on Earth | News

Private citizen Sanders

When it comes to ballot measure, the mayor's not the mayor

By Kelly Davis
carldemaioCarl DeMaio pitches pension reform in front of a Clairemont Vons on Saturday. - Photo by Kelly Davis
On Tuesday, the San Diego City Clerk announced that the so-called Comprehensive Pension Reform ballot measure—which, among other things, would close the city's pension plan to all new city employees except police officers—had gotten enough signatures to qualify for the June 2012 ballot. 

A day after the announcement, a battle over whose ballot measure it is has emerged. Wednesday, from Mayor Jerry Sanders' spokesperson Darren Pudgil, via Twitter (emphasis added): "Look for mayor on the morning shows today making pitch for his pension reform initiative, now headed for June ballot. Many people to thank."

Then, later that day, this appeared on City Councilmember (and mayoral candidate) Carl DeMaio's campaign website:

DEMAIO'S PENSION REFORM INITIATIVE WILL BE ON THE JUNE BALLOT!

Pension reform is the hobby horse DeMaio hopes to ride to victory in November 2012, though he's far from being Sanders' hand-picked successor—Sanders has endorsed District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis to take his place. So, who's initiative is it? The answer becomes more complicated when you take a look at the mayor's online bio:

Last year, Sanders announced he would pursue, as a private citizen, a ballot initiative eliminating traditional pensions for non-public safety employees, instead providing employees with a 401(K)-like program.

Note the "private citizen" thing. 

"As he has said, he is bringing this initiative forward as a private citizen—not as mayor," Pudgil told me for this story on the Comprehensive Pension Reform measure. 

Mayor Jerry Sanders? Private Citizen Sanders? Huh? Who exactly is behind the ballot measure could prove to be a tricky legal issue for its backers. The mayor, legally, can't sponsor a ballot measure that makes significant changes to the city's pension system unless he first meets with the city's labor unions. Sanders knows this. In May 2008, he proposed a pension-reform ballot measure that included raising the retirement age and changing the formula used to calculate an employee's final pension. Two months later, the City Council's Rules Committee asked for an opinion from the City Attorney's office as to the legality of doing this without first meeting with the city's labor unions. Among the questions:

Can the Mayor initiate or sponsor a voter petition drive to place a ballot measure to amend the City Charter provisions related to retirement pensions? So so, what, if any are the meet-and-confer requirements under the California Government Code, and how would this be fulfilled.

The answer (emphasis added): 

The Mayor has the same rights as a citizen with respect to elections and propositions.... He has the right to initiate or sponsor a voter petition drive. However, such sponsorship would legally be considered as acting with apparent governmental authority because of his position as Mayor, and his right and responsibility under the Strong Mayor Charter provisions to represent the City regarding labor issues and negotiations, including employee pensions. As the mayor is acting with apparent authority with regard to his sponsorship of a voter petition, the City would have the same meet and confer obligations with it unions....
A few weeks after this opinion was issued, the mayor met with the city's labor unions and hashed out a compromise that was lauded then as "comprehensive pension reform" and is the reason the city's pension payments—with or without this ballot measure—drop off a cliff in the year 2029. The June 2012 measure's savings comes largely from a five-year freeze on employee pay—which also, labor unions argue, triggers the meet-and-confer requirement prior to the measure being placed on the ballot.

In a letter to the Municipal Employees Association, the city's largest union, in September, the City Attorney's office argued that its was three private citizens, and not the mayor, who submitted the language for the ballot measure. Regardless, it's Sanders who took the lead on hashing out (U-T) the measure's language (VoSD) and Sanders who announced (U-T) last November that he planned to put a pension-reform measure on the ballot. 
 
 
Close
Close
Close