User Box
Facebook Connect
Search
  • Wed
    23
  • Thu
    24
  • Fri
    25
  • Sat
    26
  • Sun
    27
  • Mon
    28
  • Tue
    29
Education of the Modern Doctor: Marcus Welby vs. House May 23, 2012 A philosopher and a physician discuss whether the arts and humanities have a place in medical education. 46 other things to do on Wednesday, May 23
 
Last Blog on Earth | News
Lorie Zapf hopes a show of community support will save the stems
News
Our case against San Diego's most objectionable politician
News
Juvenile-justice experts question whether San Diego County Probation relies too heavily on OC spray to manage youth behavior
Editorial
The devils you know: We weigh in on local, state and federal races
Last Blog on Earth | News
And then publicly slams him

 

 
. . . . .
Wednesday, Oct 12, 2005

NASTY

boy

By Nobody

Papers were flying last week as reporters, gadflies and investigators dove into more than 60,000 top-secret documents previously withheld by the board of the City Employees' Retirement System (SDCERS) under its attorney-client privilege.

Although many of documents support what everyone already knows-that SDCERS board members personally profited when they violated their duty and allowed the city to under-fund its pension system-their substance can hardly be described as earth shattering. But that's not to say that they aren't colorful.

The following e-mail was written by Michael Leone, an attorney with the law firm of Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek, which the SDCERS board had hired in 2003 to represent the retirement system in a lawsuit brought by Michael Conger, who accused the board of dirty dealings.

Leone told CityBeat his tongue was in-cheek when he wrote this e-mail. He considered it a Louis Black-style rant to his ex-wife, Sheila Leone Jacobs, an in-house attorney at SDCERS. Conger, who ultimately won the suit, says he takes it the way Leone says it was meant.

(Leone said he addressed the e-mail to Nick, Sheila's father, as part of an inside joke and “MSJ” is legalese for a motion asking a judge to dismiss the case.)

 
 
 
 
 
 
Close
Close
Close