My Friends

Arrow Up

Arrow Up
Arrow Down
,
  • Mon
    20
  • Tue
    21
  • Wed
    22
  • Thu
    23
  • Fri
    24
  • Sat
    25
  • Sun
    26
Suds & Science: Genetic Ancestry Testing Oct 20, 2014 Enjoy a pint and learn about your genetic ancestry from Lynn Jorde (Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah) and Charmaine Royal (Center on Genomics, Race, Identity & Difference, Duke University). 55 other events on Monday, October 20
 
Fall Arts
Epic San Diego Museum of Art exhibition promises a textbook lesson in the evolution of modern works
Editorial
Kevin Faulconer’s likely to tack left on sustainability
Film
Adaptation of Patricia Highsmith novel tops our coverage of movies screening around town
News
With few specifics on who they were looking for, officers held the wrong man at gunpoint
Theater
Steve Martin and Edie Brickell’s musical leads our rundown of local plays

 

 
Log in to use your Facebook account with
San Diego CityBeat

Login With Facebook Account

Recent Activity on San Diego CityBeat
 
Home / Articles / News / News /  $50 for a public defender
. . . .
Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012

$50 for a public defender

San Diego County supervisors vote to charge poor defendants for their Sixth Amendment rights

By Dave Maass
bonus Dianne Jacob

Criminal defendants who are too poor to hire their own defense attorneys will have to pay $50 for public-defender representation under an ordinance approved unanimously by the San Diego County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday.

People who are too poor to pay even the new $50 “registration fee,” can ask a judge to waive it.

Despite concerns about the impact on the Sixth Amendment right to defense counsel, many counties in California have implemented court-appointed-attorney fees, which the state Legislature legalized in 1996. Originally set at $25, the cap was raised to $50 in 2010.

“It reflects two things,” says Margaret Dooley-Sammuli, senior policy advocate for the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties: “the desperate state of all levels of government because of draconian budget cuts and, second, an ill-conceived trend to shift costs to those least able to afford it and for whom debt becomes a significant barrier to moving on with their lives.”

The county predicts that the new fee will generate $600,000 annually for the Department of the Public Defender. That would require 10 percent of its 120,000 clients to be found capable of coping with the fee and to actually pay it. The county is forbidden from denying legal representation even to defendants who fail to comply. 

“The money will ease the burden on taxpayers because it will help cover the cost of providing a legal defense,” Supervisor Dianne Jacob said in a statement provided by her spokesperson, Steve Schmidt. “I want to stress that the fee is tied to a defendant’s ability to pay and that judges have the discretion to waive the amount.”

But Jacob may have cast her vote based on inaccurate information. Prior to the vote, Jacob said the county’s legal department had informed her that the state “requires” counties to collect the fee. When directed to state law that indicates otherwise, Schmidt deferred to the County Counsel’s office.

After the vote, County Counsel acknowledged that the Legislature authorized counties to collect the fees, but it’s up to the counties individually to decide whether to implement them. Schmidt could not comment whether that information would have changed Jacob’s vote.

To Jacob’s credit, her office was the only one to formally answer questions about the ordinance. The county’s Communication Office did not respond to numerous requests for information during the week leading up to the vote.


Email davem@sdcitybeat.com or follow him on Twitter @DaveMaass.




 
 
 
 
 
 
Close
Close
Close