My Friends

Arrow Up

Arrow Up
Arrow Down
,
  • Sun
    21
  • Mon
    22
  • Tue
    23
  • Wed
    24
  • Thu
    25
  • Fri
    26
  • Sat
    27
The Casbah’s 25th Anniversary Wrap Party Dec 21, 2014 The local music venue celebrates the end of its 25th year with live performances from The Burning of Rome, Barbarian and Low Volts. The outdoor rock show will also include food trucks and alcoholic beverages 62 other events on Sunday, December 21
 
Sordid Tales
How can so many people be wrong about something for so long?
There She Goz
Children’s center is training tiny, adorable consumers
Seen Local
City takes a slow and careful approach to the public-art gem
News
Rosemary Summers succeeded in 2013, and her parents want justice
The World Fare
Kearny Mesa Chinese place serves the best potstickers and xiao long bao in town

 

 
Log in to use your Facebook account with
San Diego CityBeat

Login With Facebook Account

Recent Activity on San Diego CityBeat
 
Home / Articles / News / Turds & Blossoms /  Turds & Blossoms: Saldaña's silence
. . . .
Wednesday, May 02, 2012

Turds & Blossoms: Saldaña's silence

CityBeat grades the campaign trail

By Dave Maass
turds .
- Photo by Dave Rolland

The latest installment of CityBeat's election column, Turds & Blossoms, wherein we rate campaigns and candidates and award them turds or blossoms for their latest foibles and triumphs.

Deploring Lori

CityBeat’s gotten used to the silent treatment from politicians—but not from ones with whom we agree on nine out of every 10 positions.

A few weeks ago, we were set to interview progressive sparkplug Lori Saldaña for a feature, just as we had two of her opponents in the Congressional District 52 race, moderate Dem Scott Peters and Tea Partier John Stahl. Then, suddenly, Saldaña handler Joe Kocurek emailed us that she was pulling out because she didn’t like one of our tweets.

Responding to a question about the difference between Peters and Saldaña, editor had tweeted: “The ability to build consensus behind the scenes is the big diff.” How was this a bridge-burner? We posed three questions to Kocurek via email:

Q: What exactly was Saldaña’s problem with Rolland’s tweet?

A: The tweet echoed Peters’ talking points nearly verbatim, confirming Rolland’s bias in favor of Peters.

Q: What adjective would Saldaña use to describe the last-minute cancellation of the interview? Her opponents may use terms like cowardly, retaliatory, over-sensitive, petty, unpredictable or unhinged.

A: Principled.

Q: If elected, will Saldaña cut off the press whenever they tweet something she perceives as critical?

A: No.

We issue 2,400 turds to Saldaña because that was roughly the word count we set aside for her in the paper. We also give Peters’ campaign the chance to pick the last word.

“Foolish,” Peters’ spokesperson MaryAnne Pintar writes via email. “If an editor says something critical, dust yourself off, gather your facts, go plead your case and change his mind. If she can’t even be her own best advocate, how can the voters expect her to be theirs?”

Send nominations to davem@sdcitybeat.com.

Editor's note: The original version of this story referred to Scott Peters as a "Blue Dog Dem." That was changed to the more generic "moderate."





 
 
 
 
 
 
Close
Close
Close